Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

The need for an electronic medical record cannot be ignored for both small and medium practices. Small health practices need an EMR that is cost-effective, efficient and works seamlessly and accurately without any complicated implementation process.

With all EMRs promising the sky and having common functionalities, it is common to feel confused and overwhelmed by choice. When looking for an EMR, look for a tool that works and thinks the way you do and can facilitate patient engagement. Let’s compare Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo to find the right EMR for your practice.

Compare Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Though Kareo and Practice Fusion are ideal for small medical practices, which need to focus on clinical care and cannot spend time on training or learning the use of an EHR, there are a few pointers that set the two apart.

Implementation and installation – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Kareo offers an affordable EHR system, which is easy to use. The software is simple and easy to learn too. The user-friendly Kareo makes it seamless for medical staff to focus on providing care than worrying about maintaining the EHR.

On the other hand, Practice Fusion is a cloud-based tool, which is hosted on secure servers. The EHR is available for free and is one of the easiest tools to use.

In fact, users find that the learning curve of Practice Fusion is not too harsh, and it is easy to get started on. Additionally, it offers several helpful links and webinars for users to get started.

Integration – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Kareo Clinical comes with an open API, which enables integration with other systems, including accounting or EMRs. Kareo integrates with Practice Fusion EHR and QuickBooks.

In the case of PracticeFusion, the Labs API integrates labs into the workflow, which enables users to view lab studies directly from the EHR.

Vendor support – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Users love Practice Fusion for its friendly staff, award-winning customer service, and responsive support. The Practice Fusion team is responsive and always gives a return call to customers within the given time.

Kareo offers outstanding vendor support. Some of the useful information resources include the Kareo website.

The Practice Fusion forum shares many discussion topics, which come to the rescue of many users of the EHR who can easily find the solution to a problem. Their live chat feature is outstanding and users are satisfied with their responsiveness and timeliness.

An online case submission is an option available for all Practice Fusion users. Their online training includes videos and webinars.

Online community and case submission charges are included in the subscription fee. The “Getting Started” catalog is also included in the subscription charges. Users can purchase additional training, either live or online.

Features – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Kareo is a full-suite EHR and practice management tool for small practices. The tool includes billing and telemedicine and gives medical clinics a full overview of their practice in one place. Kareo always upgrades with new features.

Customers love Kareo for its onboarding. It is a fairly intuitive platform, though it is poor with voice dictation.

Compared to Kareo, Practice Fusion should add more functionality.  Sometimes it requires too many clicks that may slow down productivity and data entry. The lack of integrated billing is another drawback that Practice Fusion must work on to reduce time involved in doing so. The product comes with templates that save documentation time.

Practice Fusion supports some third-party dictation tools, though it does not integrate with these solutions.

Pricing – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

Kareo does not require any setup fee nor do users need to enter long-term contracts. It is a cloud-based deployment and requires a monthly subscription fee per user. you can read more here on Kareo’s pricing model.

Practice Fusion is a highly cost-effective EHR. It is a free solution that does not require a subscription fee.

Kareo offers two pricing plans for users – Physician Provider ($300 per provider per month) and Non-Physician Provider (which costs $150 per non-physician provider per month). Implementation charges are extra, including data migration, customization, and special integration.

PracticeFusion does not declare its SMB and enterprise pricing, which can be accessed upon request. Interested practices can contact the company for a quote. However, it does not charge any upfront fee.

The number of users – Practice Fusion Vs. Kareo

More than 80% of Kareo users recommend the EHR compared to 70% for Practice Fusion.

Which Software is the Best: Practice Fusion or Kareo?

If you are still struggling to find the best EHR for your clinical practice and are undecided whether Kareo and Practice Fusion would be the right choice, look for software experts.

At ITQlick, we are a team of software experts that can guide you through the process of selecting the best electronic health records tool for your practice.

After all, we understand that your first priority is patient care and you should be focusing on that while the best EHR takes care of everything else.

Let us choose the best EHR for you, depending on your specific medical practice needs.

Recent Articles

Related Software Reviews

Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox