Compare Blue Mountain RAM and FieldAware - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Blue Mountain RAM or FieldAware?

Blue Mountain RAM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than Blue Mountain RAM (85/100).

Looking for the right Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Blue Mountain Quality Resources Vs. FieldAware

Blue Mountain Quality Resources: Blue Mountain Quality Resources is the leading developer of industry standard asset management products and services—designed exclusively for the Life Sciences industry. Founded in 1989 by bioengineer Jim Erickson, Blue Mountain offers a complete, integrated solution from set-up to installation and from training to validation for medical device,...

FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...

Who is more expensive? Blue Mountain RAM or FieldAware?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Blue Mountain RAM and FieldAware.

Blue Mountain RAM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Blue Mountain RAM is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Maintenance software. FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , When comparing FieldAware to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Maintenance software cost.

Bottom line: Blue Mountain RAM is more expensive than FieldAware.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Blue Mountain RAM Vs. FieldAware based on some of the most important and required Maintenance features.

Blue Mountain RAM: We are still working to collect the list of features for Blue Mountain RAM.

FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance.