Compare BNA Fixed Assets and Buxfer - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - BNA Fixed Assets or Buxfer?

BNA Fixed Assets is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Buxfer, and Buxfer is rated higher (90/100) than BNA Fixed Assets (85/100). Buxfer offers users more features (4) than BNA Fixed Assets (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Buxfer!

Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Bloomberg BNA Vs. Buxfer Inc.

Bloomberg BNA: Bloomberg BNA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bloomberg, is a leading source of legal, regulatory, and business information for professionals. Its network of more than 2,500 reporters, correspondents, and leading practitioners delivers expert analysis, news, practice tools, and guidance — the information that matters most to professionals. Bloomberg ...

Buxfer Inc.: Buxfer is the next-generation personal finance solution, taking money management to the web. Buxfer lets you monitor all your bank and credit card accounts at one single place. Transactions are automatically downloaded every night and categorized. Buxfer’s spending reports let you dig into your past spending, drill down into different categories an...

Who is more expensive? BNA Fixed Assets or Buxfer?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for BNA Fixed Assets and Buxfer.

BNA Fixed Assets price starts at $1,760 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 BNA Fixed Assets Software is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. Buxfer price starts at $3.99 per month , When comparing Buxfer to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Accounting & Finance software cost.

Bottom line: BNA Fixed Assets is more expensive than Buxfer.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared BNA Fixed Assets Vs. Buxfer based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.

BNA Fixed Assets: We are still working to collect the list of features for BNA Fixed Assets.

Buxfer: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting.

Target customer size

BNA Fixed Assets's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Buxfer's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.