Shlomi Lavi /
May 15, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - BNA Fixed Assets or SAP Financials On Demand?
SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BNA Fixed Assets, and SAP Financials On Demand is rated higher (89/100) than BNA Fixed Assets (85/100). SAP Financials On Demand offers users more features (3) than BNA Fixed Assets (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is SAP Financials On Demand!
Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Bloomberg BNA Vs. SAP
Bloomberg BNA: Bloomberg BNA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bloomberg, is a leading source of legal, regulatory, and business information for professionals. Its network of more than 2,500 reporters, correspondents, and leading practitioners delivers expert analysis, news, practice tools, and guidance — the information that matters most to professionals. Bloomberg ...
SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...
Who is more expensive? BNA Fixed Assets or SAP Financials On Demand?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for BNA Fixed Assets and SAP Financials On Demand.
BNA Fixed Assets price starts at $1,760 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 BNA Fixed Assets Software is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. SAP Financials On Demand accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 BNA Fixed Assets Software is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software.
Bottom line: BNA Fixed Assets cost is around the same cost of SAP Financials On Demand.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared BNA Fixed Assets Vs. SAP Financials On Demand based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.
BNA Fixed Assets: We are still working to collect the list of features for BNA Fixed Assets.
SAP Financials On Demand: Cash Flow, Cash flow/cash budget, Real Time Comparisons.
Target customer size
BNA Fixed Assets's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Financials OnDemand has been designed to target medium and large businesses and is primarily focused on the Finance departments in these organizations.