Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Buffer or TweetDeck?
TweetDeck is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Buffer, and Buffer is rated higher (86/100) than TweetDeck (50/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Social Marketing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Buffer Vs. Twitter, Inc.
Buffer: We designed Buffer to offer you a both personal and yet more efficient solution to handle sharing on social media.
Buffer makes your life easier with a smarter way to schedule the great content you find. Fill up your Buffer at one time in the day and Buffer automagically posts them for you through the day. Simply keep that Buffer topped up to ha...
Twitter, Inc.: Our mission: To give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers. At the heart of Twitter are short messages called Tweets. Strike up conversations with people you know and people you’d like to know. Stay in touch with people close to you as life happens.
Follow what’s happening in your neighborhood, yo...
Who is more expensive? Buffer or TweetDeck?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Social Marketing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Buffer and TweetDeck.
Buffer price starts at $5 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Buffer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Social Marketing software. TweetDeck accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Buffer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Social Marketing software.
Bottom line: TweetDeck is more expensive than Buffer.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Buffer Vs. TweetDeck based on some of the most important and required Social Marketing features.
Buffer: Blogger Integration, Business Content Sharing, Facebook Integration, LinkedIn Integration, Twitter Integration.
TweetDeck: Publishing Social Content, Social Curation, Social Listening, Twitter Integration, WYSIWYG App Builder.
Target customer size
Buffer is perfect for companies of all shapes and sizes. TweetDeck helps enterprises of all kinds to monitor their business flow by attracting traffic to their brand and manage their social media presence on Twitter.