Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 23, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - FieldAware or The Asset Guardian?
The Asset Guardian is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than The Asset Guardian (82/100). The Asset Guardian offers users more features (5) than FieldAware (0).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
FieldAware Vs. VeroSoft Design
FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...
VeroSoft Design: Take advantage of a complete set of reports and historical data for better decision-making and to improve overall perforamance. Intuitive maintenance Dashboard with Power BI and predefined system-generated reports.
Who is more expensive? FieldAware or The Asset Guardian (TAG)?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for FieldAware and The Asset Guardian (TAG).
FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. The Asset Guardian (TAG) accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 FieldAware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software.
Bottom line: The Asset Guardian (TAG) is more expensive than FieldAware.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared FieldAware Vs. The Asset Guardian based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.
The Asset Guardian (TAG): Forecasting & Budgeting, Barcoding, Inventory Management, Inventory Optimization, Warehouse Management.
Target customer size
Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance. and The Asset Guardian (TAG)'s target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.