Compare Fluid CM and ContractExpress for SharePoint - Mar 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Fluid CM or ContractExpress for SharePoint?

ContractExpress for SharePoint is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fluid CM, and ContractExpress for SharePoint is rated higher (91/100) than Fluid CM (78/100). ContractExpress for SharePoint offers users more features (8) than Fluid CM (4).

Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Fluid CM Vs. Business Integrity

Fluid CM: After two years of design, development, and beta testing, we are excited for our initial release. We hope you find Fluid CM to be a valuable tool that saves your time and money as it makes you more efficient. The name Fluid was chosen for a couple of reasons. First, the pre-digital way of managing construction projects was inherently slow and ted...

Business Integrity: Business Integrity is the leader in contract creation and document assembly for the Microsoft SharePoint® platform. Our ContractExpress for SharePoint solution integrates our contract creation and document assembly engine into the Microsoft SharePoint platform. The powerful combination of ContractExpress document assembly together with Microsoft Sh...

Who is more expensive? Fluid CM or ContractExpress for SharePoint?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Fluid CM and ContractExpress for SharePoint.

Fluid CM price starts at $30 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fluid CM is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Construction software. ContractExpress for SharePoint accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Fluid CM is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Construction software.

Bottom line: Fluid CM cost is around the same cost of ContractExpress for SharePoint.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Fluid CM Vs. ContractExpress for SharePoint based on some of the most important and required Construction features.

Fluid CM: Project Management, Contract Management, RFIs/Submittals, Construction.

ContractExpress for SharePoint: Clause Libraries, Compare Redlined Versions, Configurable Reports, Customizable Alerts, Document Repository.

Target customer size

Fluid CM is generally suitable for small and medium construction business ventures. and ContractExpress for SharePoint's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business.