Compare ifa EMR and MaximEyes - Nov 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - ifa EMR or MaximEyes?
ifa EMR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than MaximEyes, and ifa EMR is rated higher (75/100) than MaximEyes (73/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
ifa systems AG Vs. First Insight
ifa systems AG: The free float of the 2,500,000 shares is approx. 48.4%, the majority of 51.6% is held by the management and team members. The international headquarters of ifa systems AG is based in Frechen/Cologne, Germany. The company offers IT solutions for eye care specialists worldwide. The IT-product range: EMR (electronic medical records), scheduling, ...
First Insight: Since 1994, we have focused on seeing eye care through the customers lens. Our secure solutions are shaped by a unique customer feedback loop that solicits your input at every point of care. The result is an expert staff and a family of solutions dedicated to improving the patient-provider experience.
Who is more expensive? ifa EMR or MaximEyes?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ifa EMR and MaximEyes.
ifa EMR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ifa EMR is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Medical software. MaximEyes accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 ifa EMR is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Medical software.
Bottom line: ifa EMR is more expensive than MaximEyes.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared ifa EMR Vs. MaximEyes based on some of the most important and required Medical features.
ifa EMR: Charting, Medical, Medical.
MaximEyes: Compliance , Medical, Medical.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include small and medium practices as well as large businesses. and MaximEyes's target customer size include: Small businesses and start ups.
Compare specifications
ifa EMR Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 75/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Medical -> ifa EMR review |
Company: | ifa systems AG |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | ifa EMR review, ifa EMR pricing, ifa EMR alternatives |
MaximEyes Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 73/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Optometry -> MaximEyes review |
Company: | First Insight |
Typical customers: | Small businesses and start ups |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | MaximEyes review, MaximEyes pricing, MaximEyes alternatives |
Compare features
ifa EMR: 3 Features
MaximEyes: 3 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.