Compare Bullhorn and DaXtra - Oct 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Oct 29, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Bullhorn or DaXtra?

DaXtra is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bullhorn, and DaXtra is rated higher (92/100) than Bullhorn (75/100). Bullhorn offers users more features (5) than DaXtra (0).

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Talent Rover Vs. DaXtra Technologies

Talent Rover: Talent Rover makes staffing and recruitment software the way it should be: simple, mobile, devoted to increasing efficiency and profitability across the entire workflow. The software combines sales (CRM), recruitment (ATS), human resources (HRIS) and back office in one cloud-based solution. Talent Rover also gives firms a competitive edge with real...

DaXtra Technologies: With strategic global offices in UK, US and Asia Pacific, DaXtra Technologies is a World-leading specialist in high-accuracy, multilingual Resume parsing, multi-source semantic Resume search, candidate-to-job matching and analytics technology. For over a decade we have been at the forefront of Intelligent Process Automation technology, providin...

Who is more expensive? Bullhorn or DaXtra?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Bullhorn and DaXtra.

Bullhorn accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Talent Rover is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. DaXtra accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Talent Rover is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software.

Bottom line: DaXtra is more expensive than Bullhorn.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Bullhorn Vs. DaXtra based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

Bullhorn: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Applicant Tracking, Customer Self Service Portal, Workflow Rules & Management.

DaXtra: We are still working to collect the list of features for DaXtra.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. The software is a viable solution for small and medium sized businesses as well as large enterprises.

Bullhorn

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

Talent Rover is a web based applicant tracking solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers such services as background screening, job requisition and posting, resume parsing, and others. The softwa...

Categories: CRM, Self-Service Portal, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking.

DaXtra

ITQlick rating
(4.1/5)

DaXtra is a cloud-hosted Applicant Tracking software that offers intelligent recruitment solutions both for in-house recruitment teams and recruitment agencies. The software incorporates various products such a...

Categories: Business Intelligence, Customer Relationship Management, Applicant Tracking, HR Analytics, Recruitment.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Bullhorn: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting Management
Applicant Tracking
Customer Self Service Portal
Workflow Rules & Management

DaXtra: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Bullhorn
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
75/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
16
Compare
DaXtra
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
7
Review
ADP Work...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
$62 per month
Functionality
18
Collage ...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.