Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 05, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - time@work or FinancialForce PSA?
FinancialForce PSA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than time@work, and time@work is rated higher (83/100) than FinancialForce PSA (82/100). FinancialForce PSA offers users more features (10) than time@work (5).
Looking for the right Attendance Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
systems@work Vs. Financial Force
systems@work: systems@work is a leading provider of Expense Management, Time Recording and Professional Services Automation solutions.
systems@work staff are amongst the most experienced and highly skilled consultants in their field and we engage with organisations around the world to ensure that projects are implemented on time and within budget.
systems@...
Financial Force: FinancialForce.com is the cloud applications company. We focus 100% on building business applications for Force.com, the world’s leading cloud computing platform from salesforce.com. Our applications include Accounting, Billing, Professional Services Automation (PSA) and Services Resource Planning (SRP). We serve fast-growing organizations as well...
Who is more expensive? time@work or FinancialForce PSA?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Attendance Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for time@work and FinancialForce PSA.
time@work price starts at $20,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 time@work is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Attendance Tracking software. FinancialForce PSA price starts at $10 per month , When comparing FinancialForce PSA to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Attendance Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: FinancialForce PSA is more expensive than time@work.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared time@work Vs. FinancialForce PSA based on some of the most important and required Attendance Tracking features.
time@work: Dashboard, Employee Onboarding, Project Billing, Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking.
FinancialForce PSA: Budget & Expense Management, Collaboration, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types. This solution is aimed at companies that have a large number of professionals to manage, businesses that need to automate their entire process of interacting with customers and to manage their financial resources.