Bitbucket - Top Competitors (Mar 2022)

Bitbucket Review
ITQlick Score: 88/100
ITQlick Rating:
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: Application Development -> Bitbucket review -> Bitbucket competitors
Ranking:Ranked 5 out of 45 Application Development systems
Company: Atlassian Pty Ltd
Pricing: starts at $3 per user/month
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Cloud
Links: Bitbucket review, Bitbucket pricing guide
Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / updated: Mar 27, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This article includes contributions from OpenAI's ChatGPT. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bitbucket vs. Alternatives in 2024

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Functionality Bitbucket and GitHub both offer version control, code collaboration, and continuous integration. However, Bitbucket provides built-in project management tools, while GitHub is more popular among open-source projects.

Pros and Cons Bitbucket offers free private repositories for small teams, but GitHub has a larger user base and more third-party integrations.

Pricing Bitbucket offers free unlimited public and private repositories for up to 5 users, while GitHub offers free unlimited public repositories but charges for private repositories and additional features.

Vendor Reputation Bitbucket was launched in 2008 and acquired by Atlassian in 2010. GitHub has been around since 2008 and was acquired by Microsoft in 2018. Bitbucket has over 10 million users, while GitHub has over 40 million.

User Reviews Bitbucket has a user sentiment score of 80, while GitHub has a score of 85.

Bitbucket vs GitLab

Functionality Both Bitbucket and GitLab offer version control, code collaboration, and CI/CD pipelines. Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with other Atlassian products, while GitLab provides built-in CI/CD tools.

Pros and Cons Bitbucket offers free private repositories for small teams, but GitLab has a more robust built-in CI/CD system and project management tools.

Pricing Bitbucket offers free unlimited public and private repositories for up to 5 users, while GitLabs free plan includes unlimited private repositories but limits CI/CD minutes. Paid plans for both start at $3 per user per month.

Vendor Reputation Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and has over 10 million users. GitLab was launched in 2011 and has a strong reputation for its open-core model and community contributions.

User Reviews Bitbucket has a user sentiment score of 80, while GitLab has a score of 82.

Bitbucket vs Azure DevOps

Functionality Bitbucket and Azure DevOps both offer version control, code collaboration, and CI/CD pipelines. Azure DevOps provides a more comprehensive suite of tools for the entire software development lifecycle.

Pros and Cons Bitbucket is more user-friendly for small teams, while Azure DevOps is part of the Microsoft ecosystem and integrates well with other Microsoft products.

Pricing Bitbucket offers free unlimited public and private repositories for up to 5 users, while Azure DevOps has a free tier for small teams and paid plans starting at $6 per user per month.

Vendor Reputation Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and has over 10 million users. Azure DevOps, launched in 2006 as Visual Studio Team Services, has a large enterprise user base and is trusted by many organizations.

User Reviews Bitbucket has a user sentiment score of 80, while Azure DevOps has a score of 85.

Bitbucket vs SVN (Apache Subversion)

Functionality Bitbucket and SVN both offer version control, but Bitbucket is cloud-based and offers more modern collaboration features. SVN is more traditional and requires a server for hosting repositories.

Pros and Cons Bitbucket provides a more user-friendly interface and integrates well with other Atlassian products, while SVN is known for its stability and robust version control capabilities.

Pricing Bitbucket offers free unlimited public and private repositories for up to 5 users, while SVN is open-source and free to use but requires server maintenance costs.

Vendor Reputation Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and has over 10 million users. SVN, launched in 2000, is a mature version control system with a strong following in enterprise environments.

User Reviews Bitbucket has a user sentiment score of 80, while SVNs sentiment score is 75.

Bitbucket vs Mercurial

Functionality Bitbucket and Mercurial both offer distributed version control, but Bitbucket is more popular for its Git support. Mercurial is known for its ease of use and scalability.

Pros and Cons Bitbucket has a larger user base and integrates well with other Atlassian products, while Mercurial is praised for its simplicity and performance in managing large repositories.

Pricing Bitbucket offers free unlimited public and private repositories for up to 5 users, while Mercurial is open-source and free to use but may require paid hosting services for collaboration features.

Vendor Reputation Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian and has over 10 million users. Mercurial, launched in 2005, has a dedicated user community and is favored by some developers for its straightforward design.

User Reviews Bitbucket has a user sentiment score of 80, while Mercurials sentiment score is 78.

Bitbucket alternatives - for small & large Business

Here are the top 4 alternatives to Bitbucket that are worth checking out: Stackify for SMBs, GitHub for large size business, Linx for growing companies, and Servoy for low budget organizations.

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100 score, based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing pricing Score is a 1 to 10 score, based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality
Review
Compare
Bitbucket
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per user/month
Functionality
4
Best for SMBs
Stackify
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$35 per server/month
Functionality
14
Best for Enterprise
GitHub
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$4 per user/month
Functionality
16
Review
Growing
Linx
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per month
Functionality
6
Review
Free version
Servoy
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
$10 per user/month
Functionality
14
Review


Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.