Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 01, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - A3 Modeling or Budget Cruncher?
A3 Modeling is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Budget Cruncher, and A3 Modeling is rated higher (80/100) than Budget Cruncher (77/100). A3 Modeling offers users more features (15) than Budget Cruncher (5).
Looking for the right Budgeting & CPM solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
A3 Solutions Vs. Debarel Systems
A3 Solutions: A3 Solutions is the developer of A3 Modeling, a powerful enterprise budgeting, forecasting, reporting and performance management platform. Inspired by the needs of Fortune 500 customers solving real-world problems, A3 Modeling enables you to solve the most challenging budgeting and Corporate Performance Management problems easily and cost effective...
Debarel Systems: For more than 20 years Debarel Systems has provided technology consulting services for Fortune 500 energy companies such as Shell Oil, Burlington Resources, and Nexen Inc.
Areas of specialization include Information Technology services, production data capture and reporting, and financial analysis including invoice processing and capital reporti...
Who is more expensive? A3 Modeling or Budget Cruncher?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Budgeting & CPM software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for A3 Modeling and Budget Cruncher.
A3 Modeling price starts at $500 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 A3 Modeling is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Budgeting & CPM software. Budget Cruncher price starts at $10 per license , When comparing Budget Cruncher to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Budgeting & CPM software cost.
Bottom line: A3 Modeling is more expensive than Budget Cruncher.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared A3 Modeling Vs. Budget Cruncher based on some of the most important and required Budgeting & CPM features.
A3 Modeling: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Budgeting & Forecasting, Fund-Accounting, Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting, Customizable Dashboard, Customizable Features, Dashboarding.
Budget Cruncher: Basic Reports, Document Management, Project Budgeting, Cash flow/cash budget, Forecasting.
Target customer size
The software is basically intended for large enterprises, although medium businesses can also benefit from its services. The software is a viable product for organizations and businesses of all sizes.