Compare Aconex and Azure DevOps Server - Aug 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Aug 25, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Aconex or Azure DevOps Server?

Azure DevOps Server is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Aconex, and Azure DevOps Server is rated higher (88/100) than Aconex (83/100). Aconex offers users more features (7) than Azure DevOps Server (3).

Looking for the right Project Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Aconex Vs. Microsoft

Aconex: If you’re just getting to know us, know that Aconex is the world’s most widely-used online collaboration platform for construction and engineering projects. We’ve over 10 years’ experience working with top owners, construction and project managers, contractors, architects and consultants on projects of all shapes and sizes. On retail, residentia...

Microsoft: Microsoft Corporation is an American corporation that develops, manufactures, licenses and supports a wide range of products and services related to computing. The company was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen on April 4, 1975. Microsoft is the world's largest software maker measured by revenues.

Who is more expensive? Aconex or Team Foundation Server?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aconex and Team Foundation Server.

Aconex price Has a free version , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aconex is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Project Management software. Team Foundation Server price starts at $6 per user/month , When comparing Team Foundation Server to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Project Management software cost.

Bottom line: Team Foundation Server is more expensive than Aconex.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Aconex Vs. Azure DevOps Server based on some of the most important and required Project Management features.

Aconex: Document Management, Project Management, Scheduling, Contract Management, Cost Management, Document Management, Scheduling.

Team Foundation Server: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

The software is extensive enough to meet the requirements of all business sizes and construction projects. The software has been deployed in a wide range of small, medium and large businesses.



Aconex

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

Has a free version

Aconex is a cloud-based software developed to help in connecting different groups in project management. The software works well in medium-sized companies and large-sized companies majorly dealing with construc...

Categories: Construction, Capital Program Management, Construction Apps, Construction Program & Portfolio Management.

Azure DevOps Server

ITQlick rating
(3/5)

starts at $6 per user/month

Azure DevOps Server is a project and source code management solution for businesses of all sizes. It also features various task management and resource management capabilities. The software was developed and la...

Categories: , Project Collaboration, Development project.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Aconex: 7 Features

Document Management
Project Management
Scheduling
Contract Management
Cost Management
Document Management
Scheduling

Team Foundation Server: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Aconex
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
17
Review
Compare
Azure De...
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$6 per user/month
Functionality
6
Trello
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$5 per user/month
Functionality
16
Review
Basecamp
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$11 per user/month
Functionality
15
monday.c...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$10 per seat/month
Functionality
92

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.