Compare Active and SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Active or SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration?

Active is more expensive to implement (TCO) than SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration, and SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration is rated higher (91/100) than Active (67/100). SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration offers users more features (3) than Active (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration!

Looking for the right Risk Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Sword Active Risk Vs. SAP

Sword Active Risk: Active Risk provides Enterprise Risk Management software that drives business performance and corporate growth by providing a new set of management information that enables more informed decision making about certainty within the business model.

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who is more expensive? Active Risk Manager or SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Risk Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Active Risk Manager and SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration.

Active Risk Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Active Risk Manager is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Risk Management software. SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Active Risk Manager is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Risk Management software.

Bottom line: Active Risk Manager is more expensive than SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Active Vs. SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration based on some of the most important and required Risk Management features.

Active Risk Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for Active Risk Manager.

SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Active Risk Manager's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and SAP NetWeaver Process Orchestration's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.