Shlomi Lavi / Mar 09, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.
ActivTrak is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hubstaff, Hubstaff is rated higher (94/100) than ActivTrak (79/100). Hubstaff offers more features (10) to their users than ActivTrak (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Hubstaff!
Looking for the right Employee Management solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
Birch Grove Software: ActivTrak is an free cloud-based productivity monitoring service. By tracking application and web usage on your workstations, it allows you to answer the question - "Who's doing what and for how long." What makes ActivTrak unique is its strategy of building statistics based on the caption of the active window, i.e. the titlebar. Depending on the ap...
Hubstaff: We provide a SAAS solution for Employee Productivity and time tracking. We specialize in servicing companies that have many virtual employees or a service related business where you must communicate hours worked to your clients. Hubstaff helps make this process automatic and accurate providing screenshots and exact detail of the work completed.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for ActivTrak and Hubstaff.
ActivTrak price starts at $9 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 ActivTrak is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Employee Management software. Hubstaff price starts at $7 per user/month , when comparing Hubstaff to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Employee Management software cost.
Bottom line: ActivTrak is more expensive than Hubstaff.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared ActivTrak Vs. Hubstaff based on some of the most important and required Employee Management features. ActivTrak: We are still working to collect the list of features for ActivTrak. Hubstaff: Mobile Access, Billing & Invoicing, Automatic Time Capture, Hourly Employee Tracking, Multiple Pay Rates.
ActivTrak's typical customers include: SMBs, The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.
starts at $9 per user/month
ActivTrak is a leading cloud-based Human Resources software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. ActivTrak received a rating of 3.3 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered avera...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 79/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (3.3/5) |
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> ActivTrak |
| Company: | Birch Grove Software |
| Pricing: | starts at $9 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | ActivTrak review, ActivTrak pricing, ActivTrak alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 94/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.6/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> Hubstaff |
| Company: | Hubstaff |
| Pricing: | starts at $7 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Hubstaff review, Hubstaff pricing, Hubstaff alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.