Compare Aepona and Balanced Scorecard - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 12, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Aepona or Balanced Scorecard?

Balanced Scorecard is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Aepona, and Balanced Scorecard is rated higher (92/100) than Aepona (59/100). Balanced Scorecard offers users more features (6) than Aepona (0).

Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Accelerite Vs. MGI Solution

Accelerite: Accelerite’s software suite of cloud, IoT solutions and advanced endpoint management make it easy for enterprises to simplify and secure today’s complex, ever-evolving infrastructure. Fortune 500s, SMEs, operators, service providers and VARs around the world rely on Accelerite products to secure connected enterprises from a single pane view, quickl...

MGI Solution: MGI Solutions is a management consulting and custom software development firm specializing in corporate performance management (CPM) solutions. The company was founded byTony Ciotti in 1994 to consult high net worth investors on private equity investments and to consult growth companies on capital formation, corporate financial strategies, merg...

Who is more expensive? Aepona or Balanced Scorecard?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aepona and Balanced Scorecard.

Aepona accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aepona is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. Balanced Scorecard price starts at $125 per user/month , When comparing Balanced Scorecard to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Enterprise Integration software cost.

Bottom line: Balanced Scorecard is more expensive than Aepona.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Aepona Vs. Balanced Scorecard based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.

Aepona: We are still working to collect the list of features for Aepona.

Balanced Scorecard: Basic Reports, Dashboard, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data analysis.

Target customer size

Aepona's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software include small and medium businesses from a variety of industries.

Aepona

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

Aepona is a fast growing cloud-based Enterprise Integration software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. Aepona received a rating of 4.8 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered...

Categories: Data integration, Enterprise Content Management, IT Asset Management, File Storage.

Balanced Scorecard

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $125 per user/month

Balanced Scorecard is a cloud-based and on-premise strategic planning & management system tailored for small size and medium businesses. The software helps organizations to communicate their goals, align their ...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Business Intelligence, Dashboards & KPIs, Data analysis, Reporting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Aepona: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Balanced Scorecard: 6 Features

Basic Reports
Dashboard
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Data analysis
Project Collaboration
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Aepona
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
59/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
Review
Compare
Balanced...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$125 per user/month
Functionality
16
Zapier
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$19.99 per month
Functionality
5
Review
CloverET...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$4,000 per license
Functionality
3
ShareVau...
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.