Compare Aepona and Filevine - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 24, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Aepona or Filevine?

Aepona is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Filevine, and Filevine is rated higher (96/100) than Aepona (59/100). Filevine offers users more features (9) than Aepona (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Filevine!

Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Accelerite Vs. Filevine

Accelerite: Accelerite’s software suite of cloud, IoT solutions and advanced endpoint management make it easy for enterprises to simplify and secure today’s complex, ever-evolving infrastructure. Fortune 500s, SMEs, operators, service providers and VARs around the world rely on Accelerite products to secure connected enterprises from a single pane view, quickl...

Filevine: Filevine lets you communicate clearly without interrupting each others workflows. Share and edit documents, assign tasks and connect calendars to stay in sync and on time.

Who is more expensive? Aepona or Filevine?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aepona and Filevine.

Aepona accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aepona is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. Filevine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aepona is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software.

Bottom line: Aepona cost is around the same cost of Filevine.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Aepona Vs. Filevine based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.

Aepona: We are still working to collect the list of features for Aepona.

Filevine: Version Control, Collaboration, Document Management, Task Management, Document Assembly.

Target customer size

Aepona's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses,

Filevine Legal Management software is typically used by law firms, in-house legal departments, and other legal professionals.



Aepona

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

Aepona is a fast growing cloud-based Enterprise Integration software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. Aepona received a rating of 4.8 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered...

Categories: Data integration, Enterprise Content Management, IT Asset Management, File Storage.

Filevine

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

Filevine is a cloud-based Legal Management software that allows its users to keep track of the source of clients leads, set out intake scripting for new lead arrivals, and assess marketing expenditure.

Categories: Strategic Planning, Reporting, Communications, Case Management, Document Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Aepona: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Filevine: 9 Features

Version Control
Collaboration
Document Management
Task Management
Document Assembly
Document Indexing
Document Tagging
Time Tracking
Contract Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Aepona
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
59/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
Review
Compare
Filevine
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
96/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
24
Zapier
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$19.99 per month
Functionality
5
Review
CloverET...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$4,000 per license
Functionality
3
ShareVau...
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.