Compare All Orders and Circle - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 09, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - All Orders or Circle?

Circle is more expensive to implement (TCO) than All Orders, and All Orders is rated higher (70/100) than Circle (61/100). All Orders offers users more features (13) than Circle (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is All Orders!

Looking for the right Order Fulfillment solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

NumberCruncher, Inc. Vs. Circle Commerce, Inc.

NumberCruncher, Inc.: We offer in-house or off-site maintenance of company books and utilize state-of-the-art computer technology. We are extremely flexible and work with our clients to find an option that works best for their business. We utilize our expertise in accounting along with our skills and knowledge of computers and software programs to ensure that our clie...

Circle Commerce, Inc. : Circle Commerce products are based on technology and business practices that have evolved over two decades. The continual refinement of the process, and continual introduction of current technology, has resulted in a business/technology "ecosystem" that surpasses any other offering on the market. Our software design is elegantly simple in nature,...

Who is more expensive? All Orders or Circle Commerce Manager?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Order Fulfillment software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for All Orders and Circle Commerce Manager.

All Orders accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 All Orders is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Order Fulfillment software. Circle Commerce Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 All Orders is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Order Fulfillment software.

Bottom line: Circle Commerce Manager is more expensive than All Orders.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared All Orders Vs. Circle based on some of the most important and required Order Fulfillment features.

All Orders: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounting Integration, Barcode Integration, CRM Integration, Custom Pricing Options, Customizable Functionality, Customizable Reporting, Inventory Optimization, Order Entry.

Circle Commerce Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for Circle Commerce Manager.

Target customer size

All Orders's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, and Circle Commerce Manager's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



All Orders

ITQlick rating
(3.9/5)

All Orders is a fast growing cloud-based Inventory Management software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. All Orders received a rating of 3.9 from ITQlick team. The software cost is cons...

Categories: Inventory Management.

Circle Commerce Manager

ITQlick rating
(2.8/5)

Circle Commerce Management is an order management system software that enables integrated operations management, develop business processes, and software tools. It delivers solution design, integrations, cost-e...

Categories: Inventory Management, Work Order Management, Order Fulfillment, Shipping.

Compare specifications

Compare features

All Orders: 13 Features

Accounting Integration
Barcode Integration
CRM Integration
Custom Pricing Options
Customizable Functionality
Customizable Reporting
Inventory Optimization
Order Entry
Purchasing
Quality Control
RFID Integration
Stock Inquiries
Supplier Management

Circle Commerce Manager: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
All Orde...
ITQlick rating
3.9/5
Score
70/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
14
Compare
Circle
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
61/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Review
Circle C...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
11
MACH Sof...
ITQlick rating
3.7/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
$40,000 per license
Functionality
3
Compare
rapidor
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$10 per feature/month
Functionality
10

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.