Compare AMTdirect and InfoSite - May 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - AMTdirect or InfoSite?
InfoSite is more expensive to implement (TCO) than AMTdirect, and InfoSite is rated with the same score (68/100) as AMTdirect (68/100).
Looking for the right Lease Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Asset Management Technologies Vs. IMNAT Software
Asset Management Technologies: We offer the most robust lease administration and accounting compliance technology on the market. We help clients organize and manage real estate leases, equipment leases, and other contracts while complying with the new FASB ASC 842, IFRS 16, and GASB 87 lease accounting standards.
IMNAT Software: InfoSite’s elaborate dashboard, structured data and powerful reports are the right tools to make better and faster decisions with fewer resources. This complete and flexible solution will always keep you on top of critical dates, costs and tasks.
Who is more expensive? AMTdirect or InfoSite?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Lease Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for AMTdirect and InfoSite.
AMTdirect price starts at $500 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 AMTdirect is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Lease Management software. InfoSite accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 AMTdirect is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Lease Management software.
Bottom line: InfoSite is more expensive than AMTdirect.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared AMTdirect Vs. InfoSite based on some of the most important and required Lease Management features.
AMTdirect: We are still working to collect the list of features for AMTdirect.
InfoSite: We are still working to collect the list of features for InfoSite.
Target customer size
AMTdirect's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and InfoSite's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
AMTdirect Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 68/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Lease Management -> AMTdirect review |
Company: | Asset Management Technologies |
Pricing: | starts at $500 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | AMTdirect review, AMTdirect pricing, AMTdirect alternatives |
InfoSite Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 68/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Lease Management -> InfoSite review |
Company: | IMNAT Software |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | InfoSite review, InfoSite pricing, InfoSite alternatives |
Compare features
AMTdirect: 0 Features
InfoSite: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.