Compare APS and SaplingHR - Feb 2023
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - APS or SaplingHR?
APS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than SaplingHR, and APS is rated higher (98/100) than SaplingHR (90/100). APS offers users more features (7) than SaplingHR (4).
Looking for the right Human Resources solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
APS Vs. Sapling Technologies
APS: APS is a national workforce management and payroll tax compliance provider committed to delivering value through flexible cloud technology and individualized support. Our cloud-based solution provides payroll, core HR, time & attendance, self-service, and mobile in a single platform which can adapt to meet changing customer needs.
Sapling Technologies: Sapling’s Onboarding and HRIS platform helps mid-sized companies automate and elevate their employee experience, with deep integrations with all the google applications your team already knows and loves. See why companies all over the world like, Sephora, Udemy, KPMG, and Invision are making the switch to Sapling’s G Suite powered solution to ex...
Who is more expensive? APS or SaplingHR?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Human Resources software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for APS and SaplingHR.
APS price starts at $50 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 APS is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Human Resources software. SaplingHR price starts at $4.92 per user/month , When comparing SaplingHR to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Human Resources software cost.
Bottom line: APS is more expensive than SaplingHR.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared APS Vs. SaplingHR based on some of the most important and required Human Resources features.
APS: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, Payroll, Direct Deposit, Payroll Tax Management, W-2 Preparation, Wage Garnishment.
SaplingHR: Human Resources, Employee Scheduling, Electronic Workflow, Product Lifecycle Management.
Target customer size
APS's typical customers include: SMBs, and SaplingHR's target customer size include: SMBs.
Compare specifications
APS Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 98/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Human Resources -> APS review |
Company: | APS |
Pricing: | starts at $50 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | APS review, APS pricing, APS alternatives |
SaplingHR Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Human Resources -> SaplingHR review |
Company: | Sapling Technologies |
Pricing: | starts at $4.92 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | SaplingHR review, SaplingHR pricing, SaplingHR alternatives |
Compare features
APS: 7 Features
SaplingHR: 4 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.