Shlomi Lavi / Mar 11, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Arena PDXViewer is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Box, and Box is rated higher (92/100) than Arena PDXViewer (78/100). Box offers users more features (8) than Arena PDXViewer (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Box!
Looking for the right File Sharing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Arena: Arena pioneered cloud PLM applications over a decade ago. They possess over 70,000 global BOMControl users to date who have affected 2,000,000 change orders, 6,000,000 design files and 20,000,000 item records. The company's products, including BOMControl, PartsList and PDXViewer, enable engineering and manufacturing teams, with their extended supp...
Box.net: Box.net is the maker of Box software that lets you store all of your content online, so you can access, manage and share it from anywhere. Integrate Box with Google Apps and Salesforce and access Box on mobile devices
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of File Sharing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Arena PDXViewer and Box.
Arena PDXViewer price starts at $79 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Arena PDXViewer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of File Sharing software. Box price starts at $15 per user/month , When comparing Box to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average File Sharing software cost.
Bottom line: Arena PDXViewer is more expensive than Box.
We've compared Arena PDXViewer Vs. Box based on some of the most important and required File Sharing features.
Arena PDXViewer: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Box: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Version Control, Document Indexing.
The software is a viable product for small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises. Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises.
starts at $79 per user/month
Arena PDXViewer is a build package sharing solution for businesses of all sizes. For build packages, it offers viewing, filtering, previewing, and downloading capabilities. The software was designed and...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 78/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | File Sharing -> Arena PDXViewer review |
| Company: | Arena |
| Pricing: | starts at $79 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | Arena PDXViewer review, Arena PDXViewer pricing, Arena PDXViewer alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Document Management -> Box review |
| Company: | Box.net |
| Pricing: | starts at $15 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Box review, Box pricing, Box alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.