Compare Arena PLM and APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) - Aug 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Arena PLM or APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling)?

APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Arena PLM, and Arena PLM is rated higher (83/100) than APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) (50/100). APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) offers users more features (9) than Arena PLM (5).

Looking for the right Product Lifecycle Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Arena Vs. Beas Group AG

Arena: Arena pioneered cloud PLM applications over a decade ago. They possess over 70,000 global BOMControl users to date who have affected 2,000,000 change orders, 6,000,000 design files and 20,000,000 item records. The company's products, including BOMControl, PartsList and PDXViewer, enable engineering and manufacturing teams, with their extended supp...

Beas Group AG: Beas Group AG has been the solution partner for small and medium-sized companies for over twenty years, so you can expect us to speak your language. From 2002, we have concentrated exclusively on the manufacturing and marketing of our industry solutions be.as based on SAP Business One, which is oriented to meet your special requirements. As a ...

Who is more expensive? Arena PLM or APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling)?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Product Lifecycle Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Arena PLM and APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling).

Arena PLM price starts at $89 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Arena PLM is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Product Lifecycle Management software. APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) price starts at $50 per month , When comparing APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Product Lifecycle Management software cost.

Bottom line: APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) is more expensive than Arena PLM.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Arena PLM Vs. APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling) based on some of the most important and required Product Lifecycle Management features.

Arena PLM: Document Management, Project Management, Compliance , Design Management, Product Lifecycle Management.

APS (Advanced Planning and Scheduling): HR Analytics, Workforce Management, Payroll, Attendance Tracking, Payroll.

Target customer size

Arena PLM's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a viable product for small and medium businesses and subsidiaries and industry offices of large corporations.