Compare Assetware Tracking and Transpose - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Assetware Tracking or Transpose?

Assetware Tracking is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Transpose, and Transpose is rated higher (85/100) than Assetware Tracking (53/100). Transpose offers users more features (5) than Assetware Tracking (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Transpose!

Looking for the right Asset Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

AssetWare Technology Ltd Vs. Transpose Technologies

AssetWare Technology Ltd: We are an independent software developer and vendor that specialises in the field of Fixed Asset Management. Our products, services and solutions are all designed upon real-world experience gained from, and by our clients over more than 25 years.

Transpose Technologies: Transpose Software is a company with decades of experience in analysis, design, development and support, and has created a huge range of applications, websites and mobile apps. We've worked on a wide range of bespoke, business critical, systems for global corporations. Our current clients include General Motors, Marshall Amplification and a num...

Who is more expensive? Assetware Tracking or Transpose?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Asset Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Assetware Tracking and Transpose.

Assetware Tracking price starts at $1,595 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Assetware Tracking is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Asset Tracking software. Transpose price starts at $14.99 per user/month , When comparing Transpose to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Asset Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Assetware Tracking is more expensive than Transpose.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Assetware Tracking Vs. Transpose based on some of the most important and required Asset Tracking features.

Assetware Tracking: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Transpose: Barcoding, Fixed Asset Management, Multi-Location, RFID Integration, Inventory Management.

Target customer size

Assetware Tracking's typical customers include: Medium business, Large business, Private use, and Transpose's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.