Compare Astea Alliance and Wintac - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 19, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Astea Alliance or Wintac?

Astea Alliance is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Wintac, and Wintac is rated higher (91/100) than Astea Alliance (78/100). Wintac offers users more features (16) than Astea Alliance (6). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Wintac!

Looking for the right Booking and scheduling solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Astea International Vs. Intac International

Astea International: Astea International (NASDAQ: ATEA) is a global provider of end-to-end service management software solutions that offer all the cornerstones of service lifecycle management, including customer management, service management, asset management, forward and reverse logistics management and mobile workforce management and optimization. Astea’s solutions...

Intac International: Founded in 1988 and headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, Intac International is the maker of Wintac - the award-winning, #1 best-selling, all-in-one business automation software for field service, installation, and construction companies. With over 25 years experience in providing the field service industry with the highest-quality softwa...

Who is more expensive? Astea Alliance or Wintac?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Booking and scheduling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Astea Alliance and Wintac.

Astea Alliance accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Astea Alliance is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Booking and scheduling software. Wintac price starts at $1,495 per license , When comparing Wintac to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Booking and scheduling software cost.

Bottom line: Astea Alliance is more expensive than Wintac.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Astea Alliance Vs. Wintac based on some of the most important and required Booking and scheduling features.

Astea Alliance: Workforce Management, Billing & Invoicing, Scheduling, Inventory Management, Field Service, Contract Management.

Wintac: Inventory Management, Billing/Invoicing, Contact Management, Contract Management, Customer Database.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types. Wintac is ideal for small to medium sized companies that provide various services, from plumbing and refrigeration to fuel oil delivery.

Astea Alliance

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

Astea Alliance is a field service management solution for businesses of all sizes. It offers such services as contact center management, logistics management, sales and marketing management, and others. ...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Digital Signature, Field Service, Field Service - HVAC.

Wintac

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

starts at $1,495 per license

Wintac is a cloud based field service software designed for small to medium sized service companies that require a centralized management solution. It supports field service and allows you real time interaction...

Categories: Field Service, Field Service - Pest Control, Field Service Mobile Apps, FS Contact Management, FS Billing / Invoicing.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Astea Alliance: 6 Features

Workforce Management
Billing & Invoicing
Scheduling
Inventory Management
Field Service
Contract Management

Wintac: 16 Features

Inventory Management
Billing/Invoicing
Contact Management
Contract Management
Customer Database
Customer Service
Customer Support Tracking
Dashboards
Document Management
Lead Management
Remote Access
Sales Reports
Workflow Rules & Management
Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Mobile Access
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Astea Al...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
78/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
17
Compare
Wintac
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$1,495 per license
Functionality
27
Review
MINDBODY
ITQlick rating
3.9/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$159 per month
Functionality
11
SERVICE ...
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$795 per license
Functionality
7
Full Sla...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
$29.95 per user/month
Functionality
6

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.