Compare Athenahealth and ifa EMR - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Athenahealth or ifa EMR?

ifa EMR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Athenahealth, and Athenahealth is rated higher (96/100) than ifa EMR (75/100). Athenahealth offers users more features (16) than ifa EMR (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Athenahealth!

Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Athenahealth Vs. ifa systems AG

Athenahealth: athenahealth delivers cloud-based services for EHR, practice management and care coordination. Our mission is to be caregivers' most trusted service, helping them do well doing the right thing.

ifa systems AG: The free float of the 2,500,000 shares is approx. 48.4%, the majority of 51.6% is held by the management and team members. The international headquarters of ifa systems AG is based in Frechen/Cologne, Germany. The company offers IT solutions for eye care specialists worldwide. The IT-product range: EMR (electronic medical records), scheduling, ...

Who is more expensive? Athenahealth or ifa EMR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Athenahealth and ifa EMR.

Athenahealth price starts at $140 per provider/month + 4% to 7% , On a scale between 1 to 10 Athenahealth is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical software. ifa EMR accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Athenahealth is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Medical software.

Bottom line: ifa EMR is more expensive than Athenahealth.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Athenahealth Vs. ifa EMR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.

Athenahealth: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Security, Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Email, Task Management, Backup, Remote Access, Billing & Invoicing.

ifa EMR: Charting, Medical, Medical.

Target customer size

Athenahealth's medical software is primarily designed for medical practices, including primary care physicians, specialists, and small to mid-size practices. Customers of the software include small and medium practices as well as large businesses.