Compare Attendance on Demand and HRM Direct - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Attendance on Demand or HRM Direct?

HRM Direct is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Attendance on Demand, and HRM Direct is rated with the same score (82/100) as Attendance on Demand (82/100). HRM Direct offers users more features (10) than Attendance on Demand (4).

Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Attendance on Demand Inc. Vs. HRM Direct

Attendance on Demand Inc.: Attendance on Demand is a rapidly deployed, cloud-based time and attendance system that minimizes a company’s risk and technology investment while providing advanced features for securely managing labor data. With over 30 years in the time and attendance industry, the company’s founders have evolved product offerings from mechanical time clocks to ...

HRM Direct: Founded in Boston, MA in 2004, HRM Direct was the first true on-demand Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider in the HR space, and has empowered hundreds of HR & recruiting teams at small- to mid-size businesses to attract, recruit, and onboard the best talent ever since. Now in our 7th consecutive year of double-digit growth, HRM has a mature produ...

Who is more expensive? Attendance on Demand or HRM Direct?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Attendance on Demand and HRM Direct.

Attendance on Demand price starts at $2 per employee/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. HRM Direct accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Attendance on Demand is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software.

Bottom line: Attendance on Demand cost is around the same cost of HRM Direct.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Attendance on Demand Vs. HRM Direct based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.

Attendance on Demand: Employee Scheduling, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Attendance Tracking.

HRM Direct: Appraisal Performance, HR Management, LMS, Performance Record, Recruiting.

Target customer size

Attendance on Demand's typical customers include: SMBs, HRM Direct is an exceptional suitable for HR and various other recruiting teams across all sectors, whether personal or public, particularly for retail, producing or friendliness markets, along with 3rd party recruiters or firms.