Compare Aurora and Aurora - Feb 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Aurora or Aurora?

Aurora is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Aurora, and Aurora is rated with the same score (82/100) as Aurora (82/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Boston Advanced Analytics Vs. Boston Advanced Analytics

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Who is more expensive? Aurora Clinical or Aurora Clinical?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aurora Clinical and Aurora Clinical.

Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aurora Clinical is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aurora Clinical is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software.

Bottom line: Aurora Clinical cost is around the same cost of Aurora Clinical.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Aurora Vs. Aurora based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Target customer size

Aurora Clinical's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Aurora Clinical's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.