Compare Aurora and Clio - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Aurora or Clio?

Aurora is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Clio, and Clio is rated higher (96/100) than Aurora (82/100). Clio offers users more features (6) than Aurora (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Clio!

Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Boston Advanced Analytics Vs. Clio

Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

Clio : Clio provides a full suite of web-based practice management tools targeted specifically at the administrative needs of sole practitioners and small firms. Clio is a single resource that eliminates the need for multiple specialized applications by incorporating the principal talents of each. Web-based, secure, and easy-to-use, Clio seeks to over...

Who is more expensive? Aurora Clinical or Clio?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aurora Clinical and Clio.

Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aurora Clinical is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Clio price starts at $39 per user/month , When comparing Clio to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Electronic Medical Records software cost.

Bottom line: Aurora Clinical is more expensive than Clio.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Aurora Vs. Clio based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.

Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.

Clio: Time and Expense Tracking, Billing & Invoicing, Document Management, Time Tracking, Task Management.

Target customer size

Aurora Clinical's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses,

Clio Legal Management software serves a range of customers in the legal industry, from solo practitioners to large law firms with multiple locations.