Boston Advanced Analytics provides hospital-based clinics and researchers with electronic health record software engineered specifically for practitioners. Built in clinical and treatment specific workflows wit...
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Medsphere is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Aurora, and Medsphere is rated with the same score (82/100) as Aurora (82/100). Medsphere offers users more features (7) than Aurora (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Medsphere!
Looking for the right Electronic Medical Records solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Boston Advanced Analytics: Boston Advanced Analytics (Previously Coping Systems, Inc.) specializes in healthcare IT solutions - dedicated to helping both researchers and providers reduce cost while continuously improving quality of care, patient safety and treatment outcomes.
Medsphere Systems Corporation: Founded in 2002, Medsphere Systems Corporation helps healthcare providers achieve clinical and financial transformation by effectively deploying OpenVista®, our open-source version of the world's most proven electronic health record system, the VistA EHR developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs over the course of two decades. Missi...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Medical Records software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Aurora Clinical and Medsphere Systems.
Aurora Clinical accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aurora Clinical is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software. Medsphere Systems accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Aurora Clinical is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Medical Records software.
Bottom line: Aurora Clinical cost is around the same cost of Medsphere Systems.
We've compared Aurora Vs. Medsphere based on some of the most important and required Electronic Medical Records features.
Aurora Clinical: BSA Compliance, FCRA Compliance.
Medsphere Systems: Appointment Management, E-Prescribing, Medication history, Patient portal, Report management.
Aurora Clinical's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Medsphere Systems's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Boston Advanced Analytics provides hospital-based clinics and researchers with electronic health record software engineered specifically for practitioners. Built in clinical and treatment specific workflows wit...
Compare Pricing
Comprehensive EHR and RCM solutions for inpatient and ambulatory facilities with outsourced managed IT services and supply chain management to improve overall patient care.
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Electronic Medical Records -> Aurora Clinical review |
Company: | Boston Advanced Analytics |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Aurora Clinical review, Aurora Clinical pricing, Aurora Clinical alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Electronic Medical Records -> Medsphere Systems review |
Company: | Medsphere Systems Corporation |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Medsphere Systems review, Medsphere Systems pricing, Medsphere Systems alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.