Compare Autoreporter and SAP Financials On Demand - Aug 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Autoreporter or SAP Financials On Demand?

SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Autoreporter, and SAP Financials On Demand is rated with the same score (89/100) as Autoreporter (89/100). Autoreporter offers users more features (17) than SAP Financials On Demand (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Autoreporter!

Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

BQE Software Vs. SAP

BQE Software: BQE Software is a world leader in time tracking, billing and project management software for professional services firms. Its products, including BillQuick®, ArchiOffice® and EngineerOffice®, simplify the way information is entered and utilized by firms. With over 250,000 users, BQE is the trusted solution worldwide for architects, engineers, accou...

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who is more expensive? Autoreporter or SAP Financials On Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Autoreporter and SAP Financials On Demand.

Autoreporter accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Autoreporter is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. SAP Financials On Demand accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Autoreporter is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software.

Bottom line: Autoreporter cost is around the same cost of SAP Financials On Demand.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Autoreporter Vs. SAP Financials On Demand based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.

Autoreporter: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Balance Sheet, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Cash Flow, Check Printing, General-Ledger.

SAP Financials On Demand: Cash Flow, Cash flow/cash budget, Real Time Comparisons.

Target customer size

This software is best for project managers, company administrators and executives. Financials OnDemand has been designed to target medium and large businesses and is primarily focused on the Finance departments in these organizations.