Compare AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management and FieldAware - Jul 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management or FieldAware?

AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management (87/100). AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management offers users more features (11) than FieldAware (0).

Looking for the right Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Schneider Electric Vs. FieldAware

Schneider Electric: As a global specialist in energy management with operations in more than 100 countries, Schneider Electric offers integrated solutions to make energy safe, reliable, efficient, productive and green across multiple market segments. The Group has leadership positions in energy and infrastructure, industrial processes, building automation, and data ce...

FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...

Who is more expensive? AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management or FieldAware?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management and FieldAware.

AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Avantis EAM Solution is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Maintenance software. FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , When comparing FieldAware to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Maintenance software cost.

Bottom line: AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management is more expensive than FieldAware.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management Vs. FieldAware based on some of the most important and required Maintenance features.

AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Cost Analysis, Customizable Applications, Easy Data Migration, File Management, Maintenance Overview, Move Management, Paperless Work Orders, Performance Metrics.

FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.

Target customer size

AVEVA Enterprise Asset Management's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance.