Avature ATS Vs Fountain

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Sep 08, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Avature ATS or Fountain?

Avature ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Fountain, Fountain is rated higher (97/100) than Avature ATS (92/100). Fountain offers more features (8) to their users than Avature ATS (4). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Fountain!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Avature compares with Fountain?

Avature: Avature is a highly flexible enterprise SaaS platform for Global Talent Acquisition and Talent Management, and the leading global provider of CRM for recruiting. Founded by Dimitri Boylan, co-founder and former CEO of HotJobs.com, Avature brings commercial internet technology and innovation to recruiting, internal mobility, and performance challeng...

Fountain: With Fountains automation abilities you can simply set your hiring preferences and requirements. Spend more time with candidates and less on scheduling interviews and sending reminders.

Who's more expensive? Avature ATS or Fountain?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Avature ATS and Fountain.

Avature ATS price Has a free version , on a scale between 1 to 10 Avature ATS is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Fountain price starts at $49 per month , when comparing Fountain to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Avature ATS cost is around the same cost of Fountain.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Avature ATS Vs. Fountain based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features. Avature ATS: Workflow, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database, Configurable Workflow. Fountain: Workflow, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Document Management, Recruiting Management.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include thousands of small and big companies all over the world. and Fountain's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Avature ATS

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

Has a free version

Avature ATS enables global organizations to go beyond the constraints of legacy ATS by combining modern web technology with powerful customization and advanced analytics to make strategic HR possible.

Categories: Applicant Tracking, Employee Recognition, Recruitment, HR Department.

Fountain

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $49 per month

Fountain software is a cloud based human resource management system that is designed for businesses across different industry frontiers. The primary features of Fountain software include custom workflows and ...

Categories: Digital Signature, Document Management, Self-Service Portal, Product Lifecycle Management, Human Resources.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Avature ATS: 4 Features

Workflow
Applicant Tracking
Resume Database
Configurable Workflow

Fountain: 8 Features

Workflow
Human Resources
Applicant Tracking
Document Management
Recruiting Management
Resume Database
Electronic Workflow
Product Lifecycle Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Avature
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
11
Compare
Fountain
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per month
Functionality
21
HRM
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
Greenhouse
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
$6,000 per year
Functionality
17
Collage
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.