Shlomi Lavi /
Dec 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Okta Workflows or Full Slate?
Full Slate is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Okta Workflows, and Full Slate is rated higher (89/100) than Okta Workflows (84/100). Full Slate offers users more features (3) than Okta Workflows (0).
Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Azuqua Vs. Full Slate
Azuqua: Just because business is more complex doesn't mean that integration should be. In fact at Azuqua, we believe data and process integration have to be simple for business to be agile, fast, and customer-centric. That's why we built the Azuqua platform. The Azuqua platform eliminates coding with unique no-code integration that is easily implemented by...
Full Slate: Full Slate offers comprehensive software-as-a-service (SaaS) scheduling. SMB’s do not need to download or maintain software and can access it from any Internet-connected computer, tablet, iPhone or Android phone. Businesses pay a monthly subscription starting at $29.95 for a single practitioner for unlimited clients and unlimited appointments. Key ...
Who is more expensive? Okta Workflows or Full Slate?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Okta Workflows and Full Slate.
Okta Workflows price starts at $250 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Azuqua is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. Full Slate price starts at $29.95 per user/month , When comparing Full Slate to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Enterprise Integration software cost.
Bottom line: Full Slate is more expensive than Okta Workflows.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Okta Workflows Vs. Full Slate based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.
Okta Workflows: We are still working to collect the list of features for Okta Workflows.
Full Slate: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Okta Workflows's typical customers include: SMBs, and Full Slate's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.