Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 02, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Okta Workflows or SAP for Professional Services?
SAP for Professional Services is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Okta Workflows, and Okta Workflows is rated higher (84/100) than SAP for Professional Services (79/100).
Looking for the right Enterprise Integration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Azuqua Vs. SAP
Azuqua: Just because business is more complex doesn't mean that integration should be. In fact at Azuqua, we believe data and process integration have to be simple for business to be agile, fast, and customer-centric. That's why we built the Azuqua platform. The Azuqua platform eliminates coding with unique no-code integration that is easily implemented by...
SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...
Who is more expensive? Okta Workflows or SAP for Professional Services?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Enterprise Integration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Okta Workflows and SAP for Professional Services.
Okta Workflows price starts at $250 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Azuqua is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software. SAP for Professional Services accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Azuqua is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Enterprise Integration software.
Bottom line: SAP for Professional Services is more expensive than Okta Workflows.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Okta Workflows Vs. SAP for Professional Services based on some of the most important and required Enterprise Integration features.
Okta Workflows: We are still working to collect the list of features for Okta Workflows.
SAP for Professional Services: We are still working to collect the list of features for SAP for Professional Services.
Target customer size
Okta Workflows's typical customers include: SMBs, and SAP for Professional Services's target customer size include: Large business.