Shlomi Lavi /
Dec 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Staffbase or Google Search Appliance?
Staffbase is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Google Search Appliance, and Staffbase is rated higher (84/100) than Google Search Appliance (53/100). Staffbase offers users more features (4) than Google Search Appliance (3).
Looking for the right Email Utilities solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Bananatag Systems Vs. Google
Bananatag Systems: Pulse Surveys and Social Reactions for Internal Communicators.
Google: Google Inc. is an American corporation which provides Internet-related products and services, including internet search, cloud computing, software and advertisingtechnologies.[6] Advertising revenues from AdWords generate almost all of the company's profits.
Who is more expensive? Staffbase or Google Search Appliance?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Email Utilities software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Staffbase and Google Search Appliance.
Staffbase price starts at $12.50 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bananatag is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Email Utilities software. Google Search Appliance price starts at $1,000 per month , When comparing Google Search Appliance to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Email Utilities software cost.
Bottom line: Staffbase is more expensive than Google Search Appliance.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Staffbase Vs. Google Search Appliance based on some of the most important and required Email Utilities features.
Staffbase: Email alerts, Event Triggered Email, Email Marketing, Email.
Google Search Appliance: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Staffbase's typical customers include: SMBs, Google Search Appliance is suitable for large enterprises, universities, recruitment industries and other companies that are looking for a way to make their internal search engine work as good as Google.