BirdEye Vs WhosOn (May 2021)
Shlomi Lavi / May 21, 2021
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Bottom Line: Which is Better - BirdEye or WhosOn?
BirdEye is more expensive to implement (TCO) than WhosOn, WhosOn is rated higher (90/100) than BirdEye (89/100). BirdEye offers more features (7) to their users than WhosOn (3).
Looking for the right Chat solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How BirdEye compares with Parker Software ?
BirdEye: Monitor reviews, social channels, and surveys in one place. Solve problems before they become problems. Promote authentic reviews across the web to reach more prospective customers and drive more traffic. Dive beneath feedback with Natural Language Processing (NLP) insights to uncover root cause driving customer sentiment, and make improvements whe...
Parker Software : Parker Software is a UK based independent software house. Established in 2003 we have offices in the USA and the UK. Parker Software develops innovative software aimed at companies that do business on the web.
Who's more expensive? BirdEye or WhosOn?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Chat software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for BirdEye and WhosOn.
BirdEye price starts at $3,000 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 BirdEye is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Chat software. WhosOn price starts at $33 per user/month , when comparing WhosOn to their competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Chat software cost.
Bottom line: BirdEye is more expensive than WhosOn.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared BirdEye Vs. WhosOn based on some of the most important and required Chat features. BirdEye: Dashboard, Customer Success, Campaign Management, Social Media, Sentiment Analysis, Social Media Metrics, Reputation Management. WhosOn: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
BirdEye's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and WhosOn's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
WhosOn
starts at $33 per user/month
WhosOn is a growing cloud-based Website analysis software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. WhosOn received a rating of 4.1 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered aff...
Compare specifications
BirdEye Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.8/5) |
| Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
| Category: | Chat -> BirdEye |
| Company: | BirdEye |
| Pricing: | starts at $3,000 per year |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | BirdEye review, BirdEye pricing, BirdEye alternatives |
WhosOn Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.1/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Chat -> WhosOn |
| Company: | Parker Software |
| Pricing: | starts at $33 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | WhosOn review, WhosOn pricing, WhosOn alternatives |
Compare features
BirdEye: 7 Features
WhosOn: 3 Features
Author
Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.