Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 26, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Bitbucket or Amazon Web Services?
Amazon Web Services is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bitbucket, and Bitbucket is rated higher (88/100) than Amazon Web Services (70/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Application Development solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Atlassian Pty Ltd Vs. Amazon
Atlassian Pty Ltd: Software is everywhere – on our computers, our watches, our refrigerators. And the teams building software together – developers, product managers, doc writers, bug-bashers – are our heroes. Our products help teams of all sizes track and share everything, work smarter, and create better software together.We are 400 geeks, beer drinkers, nerf herder...
Amazon: Amazon Web Services provides a highly reliable, scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that powers hundreds of thousands of businesses in 190 countries around the world.Amazon Web Services offers a complete set of infrastructure and application services that enable you to run virtually everything in the cloud: from enterprise appli...
Who is more expensive? Bitbucket or Amazon Web Services?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Development software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Bitbucket and Amazon Web Services.
Bitbucket price starts at $3 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bitbucket is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Development software. Amazon Web Services accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Bitbucket is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Development software.
Bottom line: Bitbucket cost is around the same cost of Amazon Web Services.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Bitbucket Vs. Amazon Web Services based on some of the most important and required Application Development features.
Bitbucket: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Amazon Web Services: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Bitbucket is a code hosting solution for Mercurial and Git that can help users to host their code online. and Amazon Web Services's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.