Compare Planning Maestro and BUDGET Plus - Nov 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Nov 17, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Planning Maestro or BUDGET Plus?

Planning Maestro is more expensive to implement (TCO) than BUDGET Plus, and Planning Maestro is rated higher (87/100) than BUDGET Plus (62/100). Planning Maestro offers users more features (15) than BUDGET Plus (5).

Looking for the right Business performance management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Centage Corporation Vs. American Computer Software

Centage Corporation: Centage Corporation is the world leader in automated, budgeting and planning software solutions for small to medium-sized organizations. Since 2001, thousands of managers at all levels have utilized the Budget Maestro family of solutions to streamline their budgeting, forecasting, financial consolidation, performance analysis, and reporting process...

American Computer Software: Based in Carrollton, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, RealPage provides on-demand software solutions and services to the rental housing industry including a wide range of multifamily property types as well as single-family properties.

Who is more expensive? Planning Maestro or BUDGET Plus?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Business performance management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Planning Maestro and BUDGET Plus.

Planning Maestro price starts at $10,000 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Budget Maestro is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Business performance management software. BUDGET Plus price starts at $1 per month , When comparing BUDGET Plus to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Business performance management software cost.

Bottom line: Planning Maestro cost is around the same cost of BUDGET Plus.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Planning Maestro Vs. BUDGET Plus based on some of the most important and required Business performance management features.

Planning Maestro: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Budgeting & Forecasting, Cash Flow, Credit Card Processing, Fixed-Assets, Multi-Currency, Sales Reporting.

BUDGET Plus: Profit / Loss Statement, Automatic Data Backup, Automatic Property Mapping, Cost Analysis, Upload Documents.

Target customer size

Planning Maestro was developed to serve many kinds of industries, from public to private, startups to mature and from family-owned operations to Fortune 500 organizations. Management Plus is perfect for properties of large sizes.

Planning Maestro

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

starts at $10,000 per year

Planning Maestro is a software for mid-market enterprises looking to better manage their businesses and improve on performance. It was developed by the Centage Corporation Company which has been offering its se...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Fixed Asset Management, Budgeting & CPM, Financial reporting.

BUDGET Plus

ITQlick rating
(3.2/5)

starts at $1 per month

Management Plus is a property management software that works with almost any accounting program to help users manage things more productively and efficiently. The affordable property management solution comes w...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Property Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Planning Maestro: 15 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Budgeting & Forecasting
Cash Flow
Credit Card Processing
Fixed-Assets
Multi-Currency
Sales Reporting
Tax compliance
Time & Expense
Agile Project Management
Budget & Expense Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Resource Management

BUDGET Plus: 5 Features

Profit / Loss Statement
Automatic Data Backup
Automatic Property Mapping
Cost Analysis
Upload Documents
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Planning...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$10,000 per year
Functionality
29
Compare
BUDGET P...
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
$1 per month
Functionality
7
Oracle H...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$9,995 per license
Functionality
14
Anaplan
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
24
Infor Sy...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$150 per user/month
Functionality
38

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.