Compare Planning Maestro and Gtmhub - Jul 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jul 04, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Planning Maestro or Gtmhub?

Planning Maestro is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Gtmhub, and Planning Maestro is rated higher (87/100) than Gtmhub (77/100). Planning Maestro offers users more features (15) than Gtmhub (0).

Looking for the right Business performance management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Centage Corporation Vs. Gtmhub

Centage Corporation: Centage Corporation is the world leader in automated, budgeting and planning software solutions for small to medium-sized organizations. Since 2001, thousands of managers at all levels have utilized the Budget Maestro family of solutions to streamline their budgeting, forecasting, financial consolidation, performance analysis, and reporting process...

Gtmhub: WHAT WE DO: We amplify revenue growth. HOW WE DO IT: The gtmhub platform enriches your business data with machine learning, sentiment analysis, business logic and other techniques to identify, escalate and advise on revenue opportunities. The revenue insights are contextualized in business applications such as CRM, Help Desk, ERP, etc. so your ...

Who is more expensive? Planning Maestro or Gtmhub?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Business performance management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Planning Maestro and Gtmhub.

Planning Maestro price starts at $10,000 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Budget Maestro is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Business performance management software. Gtmhub price starts at $7 per user/month , When comparing Gtmhub to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Business performance management software cost.

Bottom line: Planning Maestro is more expensive than Gtmhub.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Planning Maestro Vs. Gtmhub based on some of the most important and required Business performance management features.

Planning Maestro: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Budgeting & Forecasting, Cash Flow, Credit Card Processing, Fixed-Assets, Multi-Currency, Sales Reporting.

Gtmhub: We are still working to collect the list of features for Gtmhub.

Target customer size

Planning Maestro was developed to serve many kinds of industries, from public to private, startups to mature and from family-owned operations to Fortune 500 organizations. and Gtmhub's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

Planning Maestro

ITQlick rating
(4/5)

starts at $10,000 per year

Planning Maestro is a software for mid-market enterprises looking to better manage their businesses and improve on performance. It was developed by the Centage Corporation Company which has been offering its se...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Fixed Asset Management, Budgeting & CPM, Financial reporting.

Gtmhub

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

starts at $7 per user/month

Gtmhub is a growing cloud-based Budgeting-Forecasting software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Gtmhub received a rating of 5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered ...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Billing & Provisioning, BI & Analytics, Data Analysis Tools, Business Intelligence.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Planning Maestro: 15 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Budgeting & Forecasting
Cash Flow
Credit Card Processing
Fixed-Assets
Multi-Currency
Sales Reporting
Tax compliance
Time & Expense
Agile Project Management
Budget & Expense Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Resource Management

Gtmhub: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Planning...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$10,000 per year
Functionality
29
Compare
Gtmhub
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
77/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
10
Review
Oracle H...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$9,995 per license
Functionality
14
Anaplan
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
24
Infor Sy...
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$150 per user/month
Functionality
38

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.