Compare Buffer and MavSocial - Oct 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Buffer or MavSocial?
MavSocial is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Buffer, and Buffer is rated higher (86/100) than MavSocial (80/100). Buffer offers users more features (5) than MavSocial (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Buffer!
Looking for the right Social Marketing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Buffer Vs. Maventus Group
Buffer: We designed Buffer to offer you a both personal and yet more efficient solution to handle sharing on social media. Buffer makes your life easier with a smarter way to schedule the great content you find. Fill up your Buffer at one time in the day and Buffer automagically posts them for you through the day. Simply keep that Buffer topped up to ha...
Maventus Group: MavSocial is a social media visual & audio content management, visual analytics and rich media publishing platform for brands and agencies .The platform comprises of a number of modules
Who is more expensive? Buffer or MavSocial?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Social Marketing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Buffer and MavSocial.
Buffer price starts at $5 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Buffer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Social Marketing software. MavSocial price starts at $78 per month , When comparing MavSocial to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Social Marketing software cost.
Bottom line: MavSocial is more expensive than Buffer.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Buffer Vs. MavSocial based on some of the most important and required Social Marketing features.
Buffer: Blogger Integration, Business Content Sharing, Facebook Integration, LinkedIn Integration, Twitter Integration.
MavSocial: We are still working to collect the list of features for MavSocial.
Target customer size
Buffer is perfect for companies of all shapes and sizes. and MavSocial's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Compare specifications
Buffer Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 86/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Social Marketing -> Buffer review |
Company: | Buffer |
Pricing: | starts at $5 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | Buffer review, Buffer pricing, Buffer alternatives |
MavSocial Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 80/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Social Marketing -> MavSocial review |
Company: | Maventus Group |
Pricing: | starts at $78 per month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | MavSocial review, MavSocial pricing, MavSocial alternatives |
Compare features
Buffer: 5 Features
MavSocial: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.