Compare BuildOps and eMaint X4 - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 14, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - BuildOps or eMaint X4?

BuildOps is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eMaint X4, and eMaint X4 is rated higher (97/100) than BuildOps (82/100). eMaint X4 offers users more features (20) than BuildOps (12). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eMaint X4!

Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

BuildOps Vs. eMaint Enterprises

BuildOps: All-in-one operational software built for the modern commercial contractor.

eMaint Enterprises: eMaint Enterprises has been providing innovative CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management Software) solutions since 1986. eMaint was one of the first CMMS providers to develop a completely web-based "Software as a Service" (SaaS) model for more rapid implementation at a lower total cost of ownership. Our growing client-base consists of ove...

Who is more expensive? BuildOps or eMaint X4?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for BuildOps and eMaint X4.

BuildOps accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 BuildOps is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Field Service software. eMaint X4 price starts at $33 per user/month , When comparing eMaint X4 to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.

Bottom line: BuildOps is more expensive than eMaint X4.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared BuildOps Vs. eMaint X4 based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.

BuildOps: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Mobile Access, Customer Management, Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking, Scheduling, Inventory Management, Maintenance Management, Preventive Maintenance.

eMaint X4: Asset Management, Barcode Scanning, Calendar Management, Condition Assessment, Equipment Maintenance.

Target customer size

BuildOps's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, eMaint X4 can fulfil the requirements of all business sizes, from small organisations to Fortune 500 corporations.

BuildOps

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

BuildOps is a field service management software designed for commercial contractors to schedule and dispatch technicians with the right skill set for jobs, build and track proposals and quotes, gather and evalu...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Plumbing Estimating, Field Service, Field Service - HVAC.

eMaint X4

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $33 per user/month

eMaint X4 is a cloud-based computerized maintenance management software (CMMS). eMaint X4 was launched by eMaint Enterprises and follows the Software as a Service (SaaS) implementation model. It incorporates a ...

Categories: Field Service - HVAC, Field Service - Pest Control, Field Service - Work Order, Maid Service, Pest Control.

Compare specifications

Compare features

BuildOps: 12 Features

Mobile Access
Customer Management
Billing & Invoicing
Time Tracking
Scheduling
Inventory Management
Maintenance Management
Preventive Maintenance
Work Order Management
Asset Tracking
Field Service
Contract Management

eMaint X4: 20 Features

Asset Management
Barcode Scanning
Calendar Management
Condition Assessment
Equipment Maintenance
Inventory Management
Key & Lock Management
Lease Administration
Maintenance Management
Maintenance Scheduling
Mobile Access
Multiple Currencies
Multiple Locations
Predictive Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
Real Estate Portfolio Management
Reporting & Analytics
Space Management
Timecard Management
Work Order Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
BuildOps
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
25
Compare
eMaint X...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$33 per user/month
Functionality
34
Jobber
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
23
Review
HouseCal...
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$49 per user/month
Functionality
31
ServiceT...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$398 per technician/month + $800 one-time setup cost
Functionality
22

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.