Buxfer Vs SAP Financials On Demand

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 20, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Buxfer or SAP Financials On Demand?

SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Buxfer, Buxfer is rated higher (90/100) than SAP Financials On Demand (89/100). Buxfer offers more features (4) to their users than SAP Financials On Demand (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Buxfer!

Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Buxfer Inc. compares with SAP?

Buxfer Inc.: Buxfer is the next-generation personal finance solution, taking money management to the web. Buxfer lets you monitor all your bank and credit card accounts at one single place. Transactions are automatically downloaded every night and categorized. Buxfer’s spending reports let you dig into your past spending, drill down into different categories an...

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who's more expensive? Buxfer or SAP Financials On Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Buxfer and SAP Financials On Demand.

Buxfer price starts at $3.99 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Buxfer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. SAP Financials On Demand accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 Buxfer is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software.

Bottom line:SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive than Buxfer.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Buxfer Vs. SAP Financials On Demand based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features. Buxfer: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting. SAP Financials On Demand: Cash Flow, Cash flow/cash budget, Real Time Comparisons.

Target customer size

Buxfer's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Financials OnDemand has been designed to target medium and large businesses and is primarily focused on the Finance departments in these organizations.

Buxfer

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $3.99 per month

Buxfer is an online accounting and finance software developed for all business types and sizes. It has money management features including budgeting, accounts management, forecasting, income, and expenditure tr...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Remote Access.

SAP Financials On Demand

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

SAP launched Financials OnDemand in late 2012 as a stand-alone financial management solution designed exclusively for the cloud. It tracks end-to-end financial transactions from order to cash and procurement to...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting, Financial reporting, Fixed Asset Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Buxfer: 4 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting

SAP Financials On Demand: 3 Features

Cash Flow
Cash flow/cash budget
Real Time Comparisons
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Buxfer
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
$3.99 per month
Functionality
6
Review
Compare
SAP
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
Review
Denali
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
16
Review
MoneyDesktop
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
MultiCHAX
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$99 per license
Functionality
5
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.