Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 04, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - CEIPAL or OnBlick ATS?
OnBlick ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CEIPAL, and OnBlick ATS is rated higher (80/100) than CEIPAL (76/100). OnBlick ATS offers users more features (5) than CEIPAL (0).
Looking for the right Recruiting Agency solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
CEIPAL, LLC Vs. Onblick
CEIPAL, LLC: This is the very picture that we had in mind before giving birth to CEIPAL, to provide simplified and streamlined HCM solutions at a cost which everybody can utilize. And when we say everybody, we mean everybody. And before we knew it we were well underway in making a breakthrough in the stagnant market of pricy HCM solutions. With the advent of CE...
Onblick: OnBlick HR keeps your company compliant by digitizing I9 Form, I-983 Form and PAFs. Based on your hiring practices it also recommends matching SOC codes and Wage levels for the LCA.
Who is more expensive? CEIPAL WorkForce or OnBlick ATS?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruiting Agency software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CEIPAL WorkForce and OnBlick ATS.
CEIPAL WorkForce price starts at $105 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 CEIPAL WorkForce is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Recruiting Agency software. OnBlick ATS price Has a free version , When comparing OnBlick ATS to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Recruiting Agency software cost.
Bottom line: OnBlick ATS is more expensive than CEIPAL WorkForce.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared CEIPAL Vs. OnBlick ATS based on some of the most important and required Recruiting Agency features.
CEIPAL WorkForce: We are still working to collect the list of features for CEIPAL WorkForce.
OnBlick ATS: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow.
Target customer size
CEIPAL WorkForce's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and OnBlick ATS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.