Compare Centralpoint and Stantive Technologies - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Centralpoint or Stantive Technologies?
Centralpoint is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Stantive Technologies, and Centralpoint is rated higher (84/100) than Stantive Technologies (62/100). Centralpoint offers users more features (8) than Stantive Technologies (4).
Looking for the right Knowledge Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Oxcyon Vs. Stantive Technologies Group
Oxcyon: Oxcyon's Centralpoint technology is a leading Digital Experience Platform. This centralized platform harmonizes the many functions you need, in contrast to the traditional approach of cobbling together disparate technologies. Oxcyon's Centralpoint technology harmonizes your information, so that each user can be served in a personalized way. Central...
Stantive Technologies Group: Stantive OrchestraCMS is the only content and digital experience platform built 100% native on Salesforce. OrchestraCMS helps Salesforce customers create compelling digital experiences for their customers, partners, and employees; uniquely combining content with business data, processes and applications across any channel or device.
Who is more expensive? Centralpoint or Stantive Technologies?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Knowledge Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Centralpoint and Stantive Technologies.
Centralpoint accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Centralpoint Software is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Knowledge Management software. Stantive Technologies accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Centralpoint Software is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Knowledge Management software.
Bottom line: Centralpoint is more expensive than Stantive Technologies.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Centralpoint Vs. Stantive Technologies based on some of the most important and required Knowledge Management features.
Centralpoint: Dashboard, Data Analysis Tools, Document Management, Project Management, Customer Experience Management, Data visualization, Content Management, Knowledge Management.
Stantive Technologies: Customizable Categories, Version Control, Document Indexing, Content Management.
Target customer size
Centralpoint's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Stantive Technologies's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Stantive Technologies
Stantive Technologies is an award-winning cloud-based Content Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Stantive Technologies received a rating of 5 from ITQlick team...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Centralpoint Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
Category: | Knowledge Management -> Centralpoint review |
Company: | Oxcyon |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Centralpoint review, Centralpoint pricing, Centralpoint alternatives |
Stantive Technologies Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Content Management -> Stantive Technologies review |
Company: | Stantive Technologies Group |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | Stantive Technologies review, Stantive Technologies pricing, Stantive Technologies alternatives |
Compare features
Centralpoint: 8 Features
Stantive Technologies: 4 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.