Compare Clinical and Careficient - Nov 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Clinical or Careficient?

Clinical is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Careficient, and Careficient is rated higher (90/100) than Clinical (85/100). Clinical offers users more features (2) than Careficient (0).

Looking for the right Long-Term Care solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

American Health Care Software Vs. Careficient

American Health Care Software: American Health Care Software is a national software solution provider to the healthcare industry and an IBM business partner located in South Burlington, Vermont, in the heart of the Lake Champlain Valley region. We are a national company serving facilities in all U.S. states as well as the territory of Guam. Our customers encompass nursing homes,...

Careficient: With one web-based program, you can manage everything! You want to focus your resources on patient care. Now you can. Careficient takes the place of all of your other agency management tools.

Who is more expensive? Clinical Care Suite or Careficient AMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Long-Term Care software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Clinical Care Suite and Careficient AMS.

Clinical Care Suite accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Clinical Care Suite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Long-Term Care software. Careficient AMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Clinical Care Suite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Long-Term Care software.

Bottom line: Clinical Care Suite is more expensive than Careficient AMS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Clinical Vs. Careficient based on some of the most important and required Long-Term Care features.

Clinical Care Suite: Scheduling, Medical.

Careficient AMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for Careficient AMS.

Target customer size

Clinical Care Suite's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Careficient AMS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.