Compare ClockShark and Homebase - May 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - ClockShark or Homebase?
ClockShark is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Homebase, and ClockShark is rated higher (91/100) than Homebase (88/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Time-sheet entry solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
ClockShark Vs. Homebase
ClockShark: For field service and construction companies who want to get rid of paper time sheets, ClockShark is the GPS time tracking and scheduling app that is both powerful and easy to use. ClockShark makes payroll painless and accurate. It also makes getting schedules to employees in the field fast and easy.
Homebase: Homebase is the easiest way to track hours & schedule—for free! We build modern software for local businesses and their employees. Our goal is to make hourly work easy.
Who is more expensive? ClockShark or Homebase?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time-sheet entry software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ClockShark and Homebase.
ClockShark price starts at $3 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 ClockShark is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Time-sheet entry software. Homebase price starts at $14 per location/month , When comparing Homebase to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time-sheet entry software cost.
Bottom line: ClockShark is more expensive than Homebase.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared ClockShark Vs. Homebase based on some of the most important and required Time-sheet entry features.
ClockShark: Mobile Access, Data Analysis Tools, Automated Scheduling, Employee Scheduling, Hourly Employee Tracking, Offline Timesheets, Online Timesheets, Scheduling.
Homebase: Chat, Data Analysis Tools, Mobile Access, Automated Scheduling, Employee Database.
Target customer size
ClockShark's typical customers include: SMBs, and Homebase's target customer size include: Small businesses and start ups.
Compare specifications
ClockShark Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 91/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Time-sheet entry -> ClockShark review |
Company: | ClockShark |
Pricing: | starts at $3 per user/month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | ClockShark review, ClockShark pricing, ClockShark alternatives |
Homebase Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 88/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Time-sheet entry -> Homebase review |
Company: | Homebase |
Pricing: | starts at $14 per location/month |
Typical customers: | Small businesses and start ups |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Homebase review, Homebase pricing, Homebase alternatives |
Compare features
ClockShark: 10 Features
Homebase: 10 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.