Compare CMAP and Team.Do - Jul 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jul 30, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - CMAP or Team.Do?

CMAP is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Team.Do, and CMAP is rated higher (88/100) than Team.Do (81/100). Team.Do offers users more features (5) than CMAP (0).

Looking for the right Architecture and CAD solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

J-Media Vs. Thrive

J-Media: J-Media is a Software & IT Services company based in Cheshire in the UK. We were founded in 2000, so we've spent over 10 years helping lots of businesses to perform better through intelligent use of technology. From software to automate your marketing to fast, friendly IT support, we work hard to give our clients the very best that IT has to...

Thrive: Currently Founder and Product Designer at Thrive, a fast growing cloud software company based in the UK. In what seems a lifetime ago I had a successful career as a graphic designer. Thrive was born from my drive to create beautiful but functional software. I'm focussed with an analytical mind, enjoying the role of problem solver.

Who is more expensive? CMAP or Team.Do?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Architecture and CAD software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CMAP and Team.Do.

CMAP accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 CMAP is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Architecture and CAD software. Team.Do price starts at $9 per user/month , When comparing Team.Do to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Architecture and CAD software cost.

Bottom line: CMAP is more expensive than Team.Do.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared CMAP Vs. Team.Do based on some of the most important and required Architecture and CAD features.

CMAP: We are still working to collect the list of features for CMAP.

Team.Do: Workflow, Collaboration, Resource Management, Time Tracking, Business Process.

Target customer size

CMAP's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Team.Do's target customer size include: SMBs.

CMAP

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

CMAP is a fast growing cloud-based Project Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. CMAP received a rating of 4.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered ...

Categories: Expense Management, Project Management, Project Budgeting, Project Planning.

Team.Do

ITQlick rating
(5/5)

starts at $9 per user/month

Team.Do is a cloud-based task management and project management solution that is designed to help companies in project deliverables management.

Categories: Business Process Management (BPM), Project Collaboration, Time and Attendance, Process analysis, Workflow Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

CMAP: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Team.Do: 5 Features

Workflow
Collaboration
Resource Management
Time Tracking
Business Process
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
CMAP
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
88/100
Pricing
6.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Review
Compare
Team.Do
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$9 per user/month
Functionality
15
CHEMCAD
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
ElectroPlan
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$40 per month
Functionality
8
ArcSite
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$15 per license/month
Functionality
5

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.