Compare CMX Professional and GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite - Feb 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 18, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - CMX Professional or GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite?

CMX Professional is more expensive to implement (TCO) than GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite, and GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite is rated higher (78/100) than CMX Professional (53/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Engineering solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Beamex Vs. Bentley Systems Inc

Beamex: Beamex offers a comprehensive range of products and services—from portable calibrators to workstations, calibration accessories, calibration software, industry-specific solutions and professional services

Bentley Systems Inc: Bentley is the global leader dedicated to providing architects, engineers, constructors, and owner-operators with comprehensive architecture and engineering software solutions for sustaining infrastructure. Founded in 1984, Bentley has nearly 3,000 colleagues in more than 45 countries, $500 million in annual revenues, and, since 2001, has invested ...

Who is more expensive? CMX Professional or GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Engineering software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for CMX Professional and GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite.

CMX Professional accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 CMX Professional is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Engineering software. GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 CMX Professional is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Engineering software.

Bottom line: CMX Professional is more expensive than GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared CMX Professional Vs. GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite based on some of the most important and required Engineering features.

CMX Professional: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

CMX Professional's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite's target customer size include: Medium and large size businesses.



CMX Professional

ITQlick rating
(3/5)

CMX Professional is a growing cloud-based Engineering software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. CMX Professional received a rating of 3 from ITQlick team. The software cost is c...

Categories: Calibration.

GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite

ITQlick rating
(3.9/5)

GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite is a leading cloud-based Engineering software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite received a rating of 3.9 from ITQlick team....

Categories: Engineering.

Compare specifications

Compare features

CMX Professional: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
CMX Prof...
ITQlick rating
3/5
Score
53/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Compare
GEOPAK C...
ITQlick rating
3.9/5
Score
78/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
ETAP
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
3.4/10
License pricing
$700 per license
Functionality
5
Review
Compare
GAGEtrak...
ITQlick rating
5/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
$799 per license
Functionality
5
ANSYS Wo...
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$30,000 per license
Functionality
4
Compare

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.