Compare Coda Financials and SAP Financials On Demand - Apr 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Coda Financials or SAP Financials On Demand?

Coda Financials is more expensive to implement (TCO) than SAP Financials On Demand, and SAP Financials On Demand is rated higher (89/100) than Coda Financials (85/100). Coda Financials offers users more features (15) than SAP Financials On Demand (3).

Looking for the right Accounting & Finance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

UNIT4 Business Software Vs. SAP

UNIT4 Business Software: UNIT4 is a global business software and services company that creates, provides and supports software – delivered via the cloud or on-premise – for a market sector it calls ‘Businesses Living IN Change’. Its solutions are aimed at helping these dynamic public sector and commercial services organizations to manage their business needs and embrace ch...

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who is more expensive? Coda Financials or SAP Financials On Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Accounting & Finance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Coda Financials and SAP Financials On Demand.

Coda Financials price starts at $10 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Coda Financials is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software. SAP Financials On Demand accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Coda Financials is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Accounting & Finance software.

Bottom line: Coda Financials is more expensive than SAP Financials On Demand.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Coda Financials Vs. SAP Financials On Demand based on some of the most important and required Accounting & Finance features.

Coda Financials: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Audit Trail, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Cash Flow, Credit Card Processing, E-commerce.

SAP Financials On Demand: Cash Flow, Cash flow/cash budget, Real Time Comparisons.

Target customer size

Coda Financials was developed to support businesses all around the world. Financials OnDemand has been designed to target medium and large businesses and is primarily focused on the Finance departments in these organizations.