Shlomi Lavi /
Aug 25, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - codeBeamer or CA ALM?
CA ALM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than codeBeamer, and codeBeamer is rated higher (81/100) than CA ALM (62/100). codeBeamer offers users more features (6) than CA ALM (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is codeBeamer!
Looking for the right Application Lifecycle Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Intland Software Vs. CA Technologies
Intland Software: Intland Software is the leading provider of Requirements Management and Application Lifecycle Management solutions that boost the productivity of software development and business projects.
Intland Software was founded in 1999 by industry veterans with a track record of delivering successful teamwork tools for the software engineering market. By s...
CA Technologies: CA Technologies has been helping companies manage Information Technology (IT) in all kinds of environments for more than three decades. CA Technologies (NASDAQ: CA) provides IT management solutions that help customers manage and secure complex IT environments to support agile business services. Organizations of all sizes leverage CA Technologies so...
Who is more expensive? codeBeamer or CA ALM?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Application Lifecycle Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for codeBeamer and CA ALM.
codeBeamer price starts at $1,500 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software. CA ALM accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 codeBeamer is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Application Lifecycle Management software.
Bottom line: CA ALM is more expensive than codeBeamer.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared codeBeamer Vs. CA ALM based on some of the most important and required Application Lifecycle Management features.
codeBeamer: Collaboration, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling.
CA ALM: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
The software is a viable solution for businesses of all sizes without any restriction on industrial affiliation. and CA ALM's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.